Redneck Worlds Baddest Bagger vs Headbanger Hollister Size L (2014)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Redneck Worlds Baddest Baggerstacks up against the Headbanger Hollister Size L. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Redneck Worlds Baddest Bagger | Headbanger Hollister Size L |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2014 | 2013 |
| Price | $34,995 | — |
| Engine | 1442 cc | 1442 cc |
| Weight | — | 235 kg |
| Fuel capacity | — | 2.4 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Beringer 4-piston calipers |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Beringer 4-piston calipers |
| Tires | 120/90-21 / 300-18 | 150/80-16 / 200/60-16 |
Redneck Worlds Baddest Bagger vs Headbanger Hollister Size L — which should you buy?
Picking between the Redneck Worlds Baddest Bagger and the Headbanger Hollister Size L usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Redneck Worlds Baddest Bagger brings its published horsepower, while the Headbanger Hollister Size L counters with its own power figure at 235 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: