Rieju Marathon Pro 200 SM vs AJP PR4 200 SM (2011)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Rieju Marathon Pro 200 SMstacks up against the AJP PR4 200 SM. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Rieju Marathon Pro 200 SM | AJP PR4 200 SM |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2011 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 196 cc | 198 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 18 hp |
| Torque | — | 13 Nm |
| Weight | 108 kg | 106 kg |
| Seat height | 35 mm | 36 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.7 L | 2.0 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Galfer Wave, 2-piston caliper. | Single disc. double piston calliper |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Galfer Wave | Single disc. double piston calliper |
| Tires | 90/90-21 / 120/80-18 | 100/80-17 / 130/70-17 |
Rieju Marathon Pro 200 SM vs AJP PR4 200 SM — which should you buy?
Picking between the Rieju Marathon Pro 200 SM and the AJP PR4 200 SM usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Rieju Marathon Pro 200 SM brings its published horsepower in a 108 kg package, while the AJP PR4 200 SM counters with 18 hp at 106 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: