Rieju MRX 50 Pro vs Ural Ranger (2007)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Rieju MRX 50 Prostacks up against the Ural Ranger. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Rieju MRX 50 Pro | Ural Ranger |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2007 | 2007 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Torque | — | 2 Nm |
| Weight | 94 kg | — |
| Seat height | 36 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 2.2 L | 0.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | — |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Galfer double piston | — |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Galfer | — |
| Tires | 80/90-21 / 110/80-18 | — |
Rieju MRX 50 Pro vs Ural Ranger — which should you buy?
Picking between the Rieju MRX 50 Pro and the Ural Ranger usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Rieju MRX 50 Pro brings its published horsepower in a 94 kg package, while the Ural Ranger counters with its own power figure.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: