Rieju MRX 50 vs Qlink X-ranger 50 (2008)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Rieju MRX 50stacks up against the Qlink X-ranger 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Rieju MRX 50 | Qlink X-ranger 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2008 | 2007 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 3 hp |
| Torque | — | 3 Nm |
| Weight | 92 kg | 60 kg |
| Seat height | 36 mm | 22 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.2 L | 0.8 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 3-speed |
| Front brakes | Double disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 80/90-21 | 2.50-10 / 2.50-10 |
Rieju MRX 50 vs Qlink X-ranger 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Rieju MRX 50 and the Qlink X-ranger 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Rieju MRX 50 brings its published horsepower in a 92 kg package, while the Qlink X-ranger 50 counters with 3 hp at 60 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: