Sachs MadAss 50 vs Znen F9 (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Sachs MadAss 50stacks up against the Znen F9. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Sachs MadAss 50 | Znen F9 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2013 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | 3 hp |
| Torque | — | 3 Nm |
| Weight | 85 kg | 100 kg |
| Seat height | 33 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 1.3 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 4-speed | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 90/80-16 / 90/80-16 | 100/60-12 / 100/60-12 |
Sachs MadAss 50 vs Znen F9 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Sachs MadAss 50 and the Znen F9 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Sachs MadAss 50 brings 3 hp in a 85 kg package, while the Znen F9 counters with 3 hp at 100 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: