Sachs SpeedJet vs Vento Zip r3i Turbocam (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Sachs SpeedJetstacks up against the Vento Zip r3i Turbocam. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Sachs SpeedJet | Vento Zip r3i Turbocam |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2013 |
| Price | $1,199 | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | 5 hp |
| Torque | — | 9 Nm |
| Weight | 87 kg | 65 kg |
| Seat height | 32 mm | 29 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.2 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Wave disk | Single disc. ABS |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 120/70-12 | 100/60-12 / 100/60-12 |
Sachs SpeedJet vs Vento Zip r3i Turbocam — which should you buy?
Picking between the Sachs SpeedJet and the Vento Zip r3i Turbocam usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Sachs SpeedJet brings 4 hp in a 87 kg package, while the Vento Zip r3i Turbocam counters with 5 hp at 65 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: