Sherco Shark 50 CC SM vs Rieju RRX 50 (2000)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Sherco Shark 50 CC SMstacks up against the Rieju RRX 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Sherco Shark 50 CC SM | Rieju RRX 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2005 | 2008 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Weight | 83 kg | 92 kg |
| Seat height | 36 mm | 36 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — | 2.2 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | — | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | — | Single disc |
| Tires | — | 80/90-21 / 110/80-18 |
Sherco Shark 50 CC SM vs Rieju RRX 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Sherco Shark 50 CC SM and the Rieju RRX 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Sherco Shark 50 CC SM brings its published horsepower in a 83 kg package, while the Rieju RRX 50 counters with its own power figure at 92 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: