Sherco Urban SU 50 vs Puma Falcon CR50 Cross (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Sherco Urban SU 50stacks up against the Puma Falcon CR50 Cross. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Sherco Urban SU 50 | Puma Falcon CR50 Cross |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2011 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 4 hp |
| Weight | 83 kg | 108 kg |
| Seat height | 34 mm | 38 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.9 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Hydraulically activated AJP, floating disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 2.50-17 / 3.50-17 | 80/100-21 / 110/100-18 |
Sherco Urban SU 50 vs Puma Falcon CR50 Cross — which should you buy?
Picking between the Sherco Urban SU 50 and the Puma Falcon CR50 Cross usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Sherco Urban SU 50 brings its published horsepower in a 83 kg package, while the Puma Falcon CR50 Cross counters with 4 hp at 108 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: