Suzuki AN 250 Burgman vs Keeway Silverblade 250 (2017)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Suzuki AN 250 Burgmanstacks up against the Keeway Silverblade 250. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Suzuki AN 250 Burgman | Keeway Silverblade 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2000 | 2017 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 249 cc | 250 cc |
| Horsepower | 23 hp | 21 hp |
| Torque | 25 Nm | 23 Nm |
| Weight | 166 kg | 186 kg |
| Seat height | 27 mm | 32 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — | 2.8 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | Automatic |
| Front brakes | — | Double disc |
| Rear brakes | — | Single disc |
| Tires | — | 120/70-14 / 140/60-14 |
Suzuki AN 250 Burgman vs Keeway Silverblade 250 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Suzuki AN 250 Burgman and the Keeway Silverblade 250 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Suzuki AN 250 Burgman brings 23 hp in a 166 kg package, while the Keeway Silverblade 250 counters with 21 hp at 186 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: