Suzuki Burgman 125 G vs Kymco Active SR 125 E3 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Suzuki Burgman 125 Gstacks up against the Kymco Active SR 125 E3. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Suzuki Burgman 125 G | Kymco Active SR 125 E3 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 124 cc | 124 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 8 hp |
| Torque | — | 9 Nm |
| Weight | — | 97 kg |
| Seat height | 29 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 2.9 L | 0.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | 4-speed |
| Front brakes | — | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | — | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 110/90-13 / 130/70-12 | 2.50-17 / 2.75-17 |
Suzuki Burgman 125 G vs Kymco Active SR 125 E3 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Suzuki Burgman 125 G and the Kymco Active SR 125 E3 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Suzuki Burgman 125 G brings its published horsepower, while the Kymco Active SR 125 E3 counters with 8 hp at 97 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: