Suzuki Burgman 250 vs Keeway Silver Blade 250EFI (2016)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Suzuki Burgman 250stacks up against the Keeway Silver Blade 250EFI. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Suzuki Burgman 250 | Keeway Silver Blade 250EFI |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 1998 | 2016 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 249 cc | 250 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 21 hp |
| Torque | — | 23 Nm |
| Weight | 130 kg | 186 kg |
| Seat height | 27 mm | 32 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — | 2.8 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | Automatic |
| Front brakes | — | Double disc |
| Rear brakes | — | Single disc |
| Tires | — | 120/70-14 / 140/60-14 |
Suzuki Burgman 250 vs Keeway Silver Blade 250EFI — which should you buy?
Picking between the Suzuki Burgman 250 and the Keeway Silver Blade 250EFI usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Suzuki Burgman 250 brings its published horsepower in a 130 kg package, while the Keeway Silver Blade 250EFI counters with 21 hp at 186 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: