SWM RS 340 S vs KTM Enduro 350 (2016)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the SWM RS 340 Sstacks up against the KTM Enduro 350. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | SWM RS 340 S | KTM Enduro 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2016 | 1989 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 322 cc | 344 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 16 hp |
| Weight | 103 kg | — |
| Seat height | 37 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 1.9 L | 3.2 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 90/90-21 / 140/80-18 | 3.00-21 / 4.50-18 |
SWM RS 340 S vs KTM Enduro 350 — which should you buy?
Picking between the SWM RS 340 S and the KTM Enduro 350 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the SWM RS 340 S brings its published horsepower in a 103 kg package, while the KTM Enduro 350 counters with 16 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: