TGB 101R 50 vs Keeway ARN 50 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the TGB 101R 50stacks up against the Keeway ARN 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | TGB 101R 50 | Keeway ARN 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 48 hp | 4 hp |
| Torque | — | 4 Nm |
| Weight | 81 kg | 104 kg |
| Seat height | 31 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 1.4 L | 1.6 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | — |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 120/70-12 | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 |
TGB 101R 50 vs Keeway ARN 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the TGB 101R 50 and the Keeway ARN 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the TGB 101R 50 brings 48 hp in a 81 kg package, while the Keeway ARN 50 counters with 4 hp at 104 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: