TGB 101R 50 vs MBK Flipper (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the TGB 101R 50stacks up against the MBK Flipper. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | TGB 101R 50 | MBK Flipper |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 48 hp | 3 hp |
| Torque | — | 4 Nm |
| Weight | 81 kg | 267 kg |
| Seat height | 31 mm | 30 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.4 L | 1.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 120/70-12 | 70/90-M16 / 80/90-M16 |
TGB 101R 50 vs MBK Flipper — which should you buy?
Picking between the TGB 101R 50 and the MBK Flipper usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the TGB 101R 50 brings 48 hp in a 81 kg package, while the MBK Flipper counters with 3 hp at 267 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: