TM Racing EN 250Fi vs Puma Falcon CR250i Cross (2016)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the TM Racing EN 250Fistacks up against the Puma Falcon CR250i Cross. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | TM Racing EN 250Fi | Puma Falcon CR250i Cross |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2016 | 2011 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 250 cc | 250 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 16 hp |
| Weight | — | 114 kg |
| Seat height | — | 38 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.2 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Wave disk with Nissin pump and Brembo caliper | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Wave disk with Nissin pump and caliper | Single disc |
| Tires | 90/90-21 / 120/90-18 | 80/100-21 / 110/100-18 |
TM Racing EN 250Fi vs Puma Falcon CR250i Cross — which should you buy?
Picking between the TM Racing EN 250Fi and the Puma Falcon CR250i Cross usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the TM Racing EN 250Fi brings its published horsepower, while the Puma Falcon CR250i Cross counters with 16 hp at 114 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: