TM Racing SMR 450F vs Cleveland Hooligun 450R (2016)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the TM Racing SMR 450Fstacks up against the Cleveland Hooligun 450R. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | TM Racing SMR 450F | Cleveland Hooligun 450R |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2016 | 2016 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 449 cc | 449 cc |
| Horsepower | 14 hp | 44 hp |
| Torque | — | 43 Nm |
| Weight | — | 120 kg |
| Seat height | — | 38 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.2 L | 2.1 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Wave disk with Brembo pump and radia l caliper | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Wave disk with Nissin pump and caliper. | Single disc |
| Tires | 120/70-17 / 150/60-17 | 90/90-17 / 90/90-17 |
TM Racing SMR 450F vs Cleveland Hooligun 450R — which should you buy?
Picking between the TM Racing SMR 450F and the Cleveland Hooligun 450R usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the TM Racing SMR 450F brings 14 hp, while the Cleveland Hooligun 450R counters with 44 hp at 120 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike:

