Triumph T 140 V Bonneville 750 vs Ural Ranger Tundra (2014)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Triumph T 140 V Bonneville 750stacks up against the Ural Ranger Tundra. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Triumph T 140 V Bonneville 750 | Ural Ranger Tundra |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 1973 | 2014 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 744 cc | 745 cc |
| Horsepower | 53 hp | 39 hp |
| Torque | — | 52 Nm |
| Weight | — | 350 kg |
| Seat height | — | 31 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 4.8 L | 5.0 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 4-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 3.25-19 / 4.00-18 | — |
Triumph T 140 V Bonneville 750 vs Ural Ranger Tundra — which should you buy?
Picking between the Triumph T 140 V Bonneville 750 and the Ural Ranger Tundra usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Triumph T 140 V Bonneville 750 brings 53 hp, while the Ural Ranger Tundra counters with 39 hp at 350 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: