UM DSF 125 vs Husqvarna WR125 (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the UM DSF 125stacks up against the Husqvarna WR125. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | UM DSF 125 | Husqvarna WR125 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2013 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 125 cc | 125 cc |
| Weight | 122 kg | 101 kg |
| Seat height | 36 mm | 38 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.6 L | 2.1 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | — |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Wave disc. |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Wave disc. |
| Tires | 3.00-21 / 4.10-18 | 90/90-21 / 120/90-18 |
UM DSF 125 vs Husqvarna WR125 — which should you buy?
Picking between the UM DSF 125 and the Husqvarna WR125 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the UM DSF 125 brings its published horsepower in a 122 kg package, while the Husqvarna WR125 counters with its own power figure at 101 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: