UM DSF 125 vs Husqvarna WRE125 (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the UM DSF 125stacks up against the Husqvarna WRE125. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | UM DSF 125 | Husqvarna WRE125 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2013 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 125 cc | 125 cc |
| Weight | 122 kg | — |
| Seat height | 36 mm | 37 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.6 L | 2.5 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 3.00-21 / 4.10-18 | 90/90-21 / 120/80-18 |
UM DSF 125 vs Husqvarna WRE125 — which should you buy?
Picking between the UM DSF 125 and the Husqvarna WRE125 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the UM DSF 125 brings its published horsepower in a 122 kg package, while the Husqvarna WRE125 counters with its own power figure.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: