Vento Zip r3i Turbocam vs Qlink Hawk 50 (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Vento Zip r3i Turbocamstacks up against the Qlink Hawk 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Vento Zip r3i Turbocam | Qlink Hawk 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2013 |
| Price | — | $1,550 |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 5 hp | 4 hp |
| Torque | 9 Nm | 4 Nm |
| Weight | 65 kg | 87 kg |
| Seat height | 29 mm | 31 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — | 1.2 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc. ABS | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 100/60-12 / 100/60-12 | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 |
Vento Zip r3i Turbocam vs Qlink Hawk 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Vento Zip r3i Turbocam and the Qlink Hawk 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Vento Zip r3i Turbocam brings 5 hp in a 65 kg package, while the Qlink Hawk 50 counters with 4 hp at 87 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: