Vento Zip r3i Turbocam vs Sachs SpeedJet R (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Vento Zip r3i Turbocamstacks up against the Sachs SpeedJet R. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Vento Zip r3i Turbocam | Sachs SpeedJet R |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2013 |
| Price | — | $1,349 |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 5 hp | 4 hp |
| Torque | 9 Nm | — |
| Weight | 65 kg | 87 kg |
| Seat height | 29 mm | 32 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — | 1.6 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc. ABS | Single disc. Wave disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 100/60-12 / 100/60-12 | 120/70-12 / 120/70-12 |
Vento Zip r3i Turbocam vs Sachs SpeedJet R — which should you buy?
Picking between the Vento Zip r3i Turbocam and the Sachs SpeedJet R usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Vento Zip r3i Turbocam brings 5 hp in a 65 kg package, while the Sachs SpeedJet R counters with 4 hp at 87 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: