WK Wasp 125 vs Qingqi Ranger QM125-2F (2014)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the WK Wasp 125stacks up against the Qingqi Ranger QM125-2F. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | WK Wasp 125 | Qingqi Ranger QM125-2F |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2014 | 2013 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 124 cc | 124 cc |
| Torque | — | 9 Nm |
| Weight | 106 kg | 130 kg |
| Fuel capacity | 2.6 L | 4.8 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 2.50-18 / 2.75-18 | 2.75-18 / 3.00-18 |
WK Wasp 125 vs Qingqi Ranger QM125-2F — which should you buy?
Picking between the WK Wasp 125 and the Qingqi Ranger QM125-2F usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the WK Wasp 125 brings its published horsepower in a 106 kg package, while the Qingqi Ranger QM125-2F counters with its own power figure at 130 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: