Yamaha Aerox R vs Clipic QT9 49 (2017)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Yamaha Aerox Rstacks up against the Clipic QT9 49. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Yamaha Aerox R | Clipic QT9 49 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2017 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | — |
| Torque | 4 Nm | — |
| Weight | — | 85 kg |
| Seat height | 32 mm | 30 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.9 L | 1.3 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic. | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic. | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 130/60-13 / 140/60-13 | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 |
Yamaha Aerox R vs Clipic QT9 49 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Yamaha Aerox R and the Clipic QT9 49 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Yamaha Aerox R brings 3 hp, while the Clipic QT9 49 counters with its own power figure at 85 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: