Yamaha Grizzly 350 Auto 4x4 IRS vs Triton Black Lizard 400 (2015)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Yamaha Grizzly 350 Auto 4x4 IRSstacks up against the Triton Black Lizard 400. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Yamaha Grizzly 350 Auto 4x4 IRS | Triton Black Lizard 400 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2015 |
| Price | $6,649 | — |
| Engine | 348 cc | 359 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 28 hp |
| Weight | — | 302 kg |
| Seat height | 33 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 3.8 L | 3.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Double disc. Hydraulic | Single disc. Wave |
| Rear brakes | Sealed multidisc | Single disc. Wave |
| Tires | 25/8-12 / 25/10-12 | 21/7-10 / 20/11-9 |
Yamaha Grizzly 350 Auto 4x4 IRS vs Triton Black Lizard 400 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Yamaha Grizzly 350 Auto 4x4 IRS and the Triton Black Lizard 400 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Yamaha Grizzly 350 Auto 4x4 IRS brings its published horsepower, while the Triton Black Lizard 400 counters with 28 hp at 302 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: