Yamaha Grizzly 450 IRS vs Can-Am Outlander L Max 450 (2017)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Yamaha Grizzly 450 IRSstacks up against the Can-Am Outlander L Max 450. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Yamaha Grizzly 450 IRS | Can-Am Outlander L Max 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2017 | 2014 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 421 cc | 427 cc |
| Weight | — | 324 kg |
| Seat height | 33 mm | 34 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 4.0 L | 5.4 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | — |
| Front brakes | Double disc. Hydraulic. | Double disc. Hydraulic. Two-piston calipers. |
| Rear brakes | Double disc. Sealed oil-bathed multi-disc | Single disc. Hydraulic. Two-piston calipers. |
| Tires | 25/8-12 / 25/10-12 | 25/8-12 / 25/10-12 |
Yamaha Grizzly 450 IRS vs Can-Am Outlander L Max 450 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Yamaha Grizzly 450 IRS and the Can-Am Outlander L Max 450 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Yamaha Grizzly 450 IRS brings its published horsepower, while the Can-Am Outlander L Max 450 counters with its own power figure at 324 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: