Znen Roar vs Qlink Commuter 250 (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Znen Roarstacks up against the Qlink Commuter 250. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Znen Roar | Qlink Commuter 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2010 |
| Price | — | $2,899 |
| Engine | 244 cc | 244 cc |
| Horsepower | 13 hp | 18 hp |
| Torque | 16 Nm | 18 Nm |
| Weight | 144 kg | 169 kg |
| Seat height | — | 29 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — | 3.2 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 110/90-12 / 110/90-12 | 110/70-12 / 120/90-10 |
Znen Roar vs Qlink Commuter 250 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Znen Roar and the Qlink Commuter 250 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Znen Roar brings 13 hp in a 144 kg package, while the Qlink Commuter 250 counters with 18 hp at 169 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: