CR&S VUN Sidecar vs CR&S VUN Underpowerd (2009)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the CR&S VUN Sidecarstacks up against the CR&S VUN Underpowerd. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | CR&S VUN Sidecar | CR&S VUN Underpowerd |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2009 | 2008 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 652 cc | 652 cc |
| Horsepower | 54 hp | 29 hp |
| Torque | 59 Nm | 37 Nm |
| Weight | — | 135 kg |
| Seat height | 31 mm | 32 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 3.3 L | 3.7 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Double disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 120/70-ZR17 / 160/60-ZR17 | 120/70-ZRX17 / 160/60-ZRX17 |
CR&S VUN Sidecar vs CR&S VUN Underpowerd — which should you buy?
Picking between the CR&S VUN Sidecar and the CR&S VUN Underpowerd usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the CR&S VUN Sidecar brings 54 hp, while the CR&S VUN Underpowerd counters with 29 hp at 135 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: