Factory Bike Chrono SM50 vs Generic Trigger SM 50 Competition (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Factory Bike Chrono SM50stacks up against the Generic Trigger SM 50 Competition. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Factory Bike Chrono SM50 | Generic Trigger SM 50 Competition |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 1 hp |
| Torque | — | 3 Nm |
| Weight | 80 kg | 115 kg |
| Fuel capacity | 2.0 L | 2.6 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc. AJP double piston | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Single piston | Single disc |
| Tires | 100/80-17 / 130/70-18 | 3.00-21 / 4.10-18 |
Factory Bike Chrono SM50 vs Generic Trigger SM 50 Competition — which should you buy?
Picking between the Factory Bike Chrono SM50 and the Generic Trigger SM 50 Competition usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Factory Bike Chrono SM50 brings its published horsepower in a 80 kg package, while the Generic Trigger SM 50 Competition counters with 1 hp at 115 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: