Factory Bike Chrono SM50 vs Motorhispania RYZ Pro Racing 49 Supermotard (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Factory Bike Chrono SM50stacks up against the Motorhispania RYZ Pro Racing 49 Supermotard. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Factory Bike Chrono SM50 | Motorhispania RYZ Pro Racing 49 Supermotard |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Weight | 80 kg | 95 kg |
| Fuel capacity | 2.0 L | 2.1 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc. AJP double piston | Single disc. Galfer Wave |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Single piston | Single disc. Galfer Wave |
| Tires | 100/80-17 / 130/70-18 | 90/90-21 / 120/80-18 |
Factory Bike Chrono SM50 vs Motorhispania RYZ Pro Racing 49 Supermotard — which should you buy?
Picking between the Factory Bike Chrono SM50 and the Motorhispania RYZ Pro Racing 49 Supermotard usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Factory Bike Chrono SM50 brings its published horsepower in a 80 kg package, while the Motorhispania RYZ Pro Racing 49 Supermotard counters with its own power figure at 95 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: