Lem CXF 2 vs Polini Minicross X3 R (2006)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Lem CXF 2stacks up against the Polini Minicross X3 R. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Lem CXF 2 | Polini Minicross X3 R |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2006 | 2005 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | — |
| Torque | 2 Nm | — |
| Weight | 32 kg | 38 kg |
| Seat height | 24 mm | 28 mm |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | — |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc |
| Tires | 2.50-10 / 2.75-10 | — |
Lem CXF 2 vs Polini Minicross X3 R — which should you buy?
Picking between the Lem CXF 2 and the Polini Minicross X3 R usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Lem CXF 2 brings 4 hp in a 32 kg package, while the Polini Minicross X3 R counters with its own power figure at 38 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: