Motorhispania Ryz Pro Racing Super Motard vs Factory Bike Chrono SM50 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Motorhispania Ryz Pro Racing Super Motardstacks up against the Factory Bike Chrono SM50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Motorhispania Ryz Pro Racing Super Motard | Factory Bike Chrono SM50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2006 | 2010 |
| Price | $2,799 | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Weight | 97 kg | 80 kg |
| Seat height | 34 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 2.1 L | 2.0 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Galfer Wave | Single disc. AJP double piston |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Galfer Wave | Single disc. Single piston |
| Tires | 100/80-17 / 130/70-17 | 100/80-17 / 130/70-18 |
Motorhispania Ryz Pro Racing Super Motard vs Factory Bike Chrono SM50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Motorhispania Ryz Pro Racing Super Motard and the Factory Bike Chrono SM50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Motorhispania Ryz Pro Racing Super Motard brings its published horsepower in a 97 kg package, while the Factory Bike Chrono SM50 counters with its own power figure at 80 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: