PGO M2-50 vs Over B3 50 (2016)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the PGO M2-50stacks up against the Over B3 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | PGO M2-50 | Over B3 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2016 | 2016 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | 4 hp |
| Torque | 4 Nm | — |
| Weight | 102 kg | 84 kg |
| Seat height | — | 32 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.0 L | 1.8 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Wave disk | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 | 120/60-13 / 130/60-13 |
PGO M2-50 vs Over B3 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the PGO M2-50 and the Over B3 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the PGO M2-50 brings 3 hp in a 102 kg package, while the Over B3 50 counters with 4 hp at 84 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: